The lovely tale of Liquor
during Lockdown and before
At every stage, addiction is driven by one of the most powerful, mysterious, and
vital forces of human existence. What drives addiction is longing —
a longing not just of brain, belly, or loins but finally of the heart.
Cornelius Platinga
The use of alcohol in India for drinking purposes dates back to somewhere between 3000 and 2000 BC. An alcoholic beverage called Sura which was distilled from the rice was popular at that time in India for common men to unwind at the end of a stressful day. . Yet the first mention of Alcohol appears in Rig Veda (1700BC). It mentions intoxicants like soma and prahamana. Although the soma plant might not exist today, it was famous for delivering a euphoric high. It was also recorded in the Samhita, the medical compendium of Sushruta that he who drinks soma will not age and will be impervious to fire, poison, or weapon attack. The sweet juice of Soma was also said to help establish a connection with the gods. Such was the popularity of alcohol. Initially used for medicinal purposes, with time it evolved and became the beverage that brought life to social gatherings, and eventually consuming alcohol has become a habit for many.
With such a rich history of not just humans but also of the gods,
what is a worldwide pandemic to stop anybody from drinking?
. . .
According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2018, an average Indian drinks approximately 5.7 liters of alcohol every year. In a population of casual and excessive drinkers, with the shutters of liquor stores down, it must have been extremely difficult for “certain” people to survive lockdown. In the first two phases of lockdown, the desperation had quadrupled prices of alcohol in the Grey Market of India. Also, According to Google Trends, online searches for “how to make alcohol at home” peaked in India during the fourth week of March, which was the same when the lockdown was announced. As a consequence, a few people died drinking home-brewed liquor. People committed suicide due to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Owing to the worsening situation and to reboot the economy, some states decided to open licensed liquor stores in the third phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic lockdown in India. This decision was the worst best decision the state governments could take. The kilometer-long queues in front of liquor stores were evidence that a pandemic can turn your life upside down yet your relationship with alcohol cannot move an inch.
The love in the hearts of those who are addicted was explicit. We might have seen addiction, we might have witnessed desperation but what happened in the month of May was madness, not just in terms of the way people pounced but also in the way the government earned. According to a report by Hindustan Times, on the first day of the third phase of Lockdown, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh recorded a sale of over Rs 100 Crore from liquor. On the second day of the reopening of Liquor stores, Karnataka reported sales of 197 crores in a single day which was the largest ever. Eventually, the prices of Liquor were hiked to 100% to discourage people from drinking.
. . .
There was a special corona fee that was imposed in Delhi by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. A 70% corona fee was imposed in Delhi, yet the sales did not drop. The entire situation was a disaster for the law enforcement officers, social distancing was easily abandoned and a basic code of conduct was happily violated. Despite the chaos created, the states continued to collect revenues. Home delivery of alcohol was allowed in Maharashtra and e-tokens were sold in Delhi.
Demand for liquor is inelastic which means that
the sale of alcohol is not much responsive to change in prices.
In general, since alcohol policy is a state subject in India, revenue from Liquor is a cash cow for state governments. In 2018 and 2019, four states collectively collected about 20,000 crores in taxes from the sale of liquor. As much as the state earns from the sale of Liquor it is undoubtedly, a threat to the Economy. Consumption of alcohol has dire health consequences. When a person consumes an alcoholic beverage, there is a rise in BAC because of which there is a gradual and progressive loss of driving ability because of an increase in reaction time, overconfidence, degraded muscle coordination, impaired concentration, and decreased auditory and visual acuity. This is known as drunken driving. (V. M. Anantha Eashwar, 2020) Drunken driving is the third biggest cause of road accidents and over speeding in India. Road accidents are not it; alcoholism causes sleep problems, heart, and liver issues. Also, it is not about an individual’s life, it ruins the lives of all people concerned.
Addiction also causes economic loss. In 2000, Vivek Benegal and his team assessed 113 patients admitted to a special de-addiction service for alcohol dependence. They found that
the average individual earned a mean of ₹1,661 but
spent ₹1,938 per month on alcohol, incurring high debt.
They also found that 95% did not work for about 14 days in a month. They concluded that it led to a loss of ₹13,823 per person per year in terms of foregone productivity. A more recent study, Health Impact and Economic Burden of Alcohol Consumption in India, led by Gaurav Jyani, concluded that alcohol-attributable deaths would lead to a loss of 258 million life-years between 2011 and 2050. The study placed the economic burden on the health system at $48.11 billion, and the societal burden (including health costs, productivity loss, and so on) at $1,867 billion. “This amounts to an average loss of 1.45% of the gross domestic product (GDP) per year to the Indian economy,” the study said. (Mint, 2020)
Setho ka Gaon

With each passing day, the ‘curtain of separation’ weighs down on the women of Afghanistan, paving the way for tyranny to thrive.
Arth


Kamal Shashwat
3 mins read
Why will Donation not help?
Over the past few days, there has been a spree of viral videos of small retailers who either run a food stall or has a vegetable trolley and are struggling to keep their businesses alive. The situation is not something which has acted as a shock to everybody, anybody who is closely paying attention to the economic front of the country during the pandemic anticipated a situation like this. The informal sector which comprises around 90% of people in employment is going to be the front line sector to take all the stress which the economy will face due to the pandemic.
The water has now reached a substantial point where it is becoming difficult for us to feel the stones. The government seems to be handicapped and the indigent hopes for mercy from the almighty. The constant argument going on is - it's a global pandemic and it is but natural that every country in the world must be equally affected. By this time we all know that "equally" in the former sentence is a shaggy doggy story.
However, everything is not that dull and desolate and we have still not reached the whimsical dystopia, the internet which has been abused over the recent past years for all its impetus for fake news and propaganda narratives, this time it has done something polar optimistic. An old couple who runs a food stall were captured on a food vlogger’s phone which presented before us the dire situation of the impact of this catastrophe where the old couple was struggling to make their ends meet let alone not even were they able to recover their investment of a day's business with just some chiller in their revenue basket. The internet exploded when people saw their condition and started gathering around their shop to help them.
. . .
Communities are the last resort for the indigent and quite rightly so the community has come up this time to help the ones in desperate need. As concerned, this may look like a moral activity done by the people for a great cause to help the needy. Part of it is even true. Although amidst all this charity we all seem to be missing a rather technical aspect of how an economy works under a situation of crisis like this when we go to buy a plate of breakfast from that Old couple operating in Malviya Nagar in the milieu of helping them. Economics provides us with ways to help them and all the other similar businesses more efficiently and effectively. Let's look at the ways how this is folding out in contrast to the way we think it is.
When the video went viral of the old couple shedding tears about their helpless situation it reached almost everyone who has a smartphone and is active on social media. Each one of us’ heart fell looking at them and all of us wanted to contribute in some way or the other to help them. Kanta Prasad and Badami Devi with help of social media collected around 2700 USD a huge variance from the time when the food vlogger asked them how much they earn where he showed just a few notes of ten and twenty rupees. From Bollywood stars to cricketers to YouTubers all paid their visit to the place and tried helping them in some way or the other.
. . .
This was just the beginning of many such videos that followed since, of small businesses and vendors who are struggling to survive. Vijay Kelkar and Ajay Shah write in their book In Service Of Republic: The Art and Science of Economic Policy that a time of crisis is probably the most judicious time to implement a pending policy. Although their context might have been in terms of public policy the same can be applied to the way society reacts in a time of a catastrophe. Social engineering and cultural changes are ought to happen and we can observe it around us. However, there are always better ways to do things as they might seem in the first impression. Helping someone in need is the first instinct that comes to our mind and with the reach of the internet, it has only expanded in the ways to help the indigent. Nonetheless, there are more than that we could do and not just the first visible solution to things which are generally short term in nature.
So, what more can be done to help the ones who are hit most severely by the pandemic? The solution does not lie always in the hands of governments, policymakers, and members of the civil society. We as individual members of society must bring our hand forward in the most optimum way possible.
What happens when we go out to help that one person who is in our dire need?
Addressing the aberrations of emotionally driven narratives should be the foremost thing. Hence, when we lend a helping hand to one indigent party in the picture because of the sheer serendipity that a food blogger got hold of her is in a way injustice to a lot of similar vendors and small informal businesses who were nearby itself but the only thing that they lacked was “luck” that they didn't get the exposure at the right time and they are left behind in the race. We cannot make luck a deciding factor on who to help and who to spare. From the consumer’s point of view, it is the problem of free-rider where investors invest in items other people in the market are investing as they are in the notion that it must be right as the other person must be having complete information. The same applies here. A person living in Karol Bagh wouldn't have come otherwise to eat at their stall because the cost of utility (satisfaction) they were paying earlier visiting that shop in Malviya Nagar was much higher than they would pay now. Even now it is pretty much the same but since people are doing it for a "good cause" their utility feels justified.
. . .
The given event is a very natural way in which any consumer would behave given the situation she is in. In fact, in times like these people tend to be fearful and fall into the vicious trap of “psychological recession”. However, incidents like these show that people are ready to overcome their fears and dare to go out for consumption. One man’s expense is another man’s income therefore we need to carry out our expenses wisely to not hurt someone else’s income.
What are the ways?
Individuals who constitute the community have always come in handy to mitigate the ones who are disregarded by the events in the catastrophe. This valuable relationship between the individuals and the community is the driving factor that has kept the civilization bustling for so long. The Internet and its reach have collectively amplified the ways to assist this idea of shared values. People amid disruption and moral compass often tend to overlook that all of their assistance may cater only to a short period. Therefore, private players and Information technology must come forward and fill this vacuum of fragmented information to try and organize resources in the most optimum way.
● Creating an agency - Zomato and Pepsi in no time put up their banners outside the little couples' shop creating brand value for them. Multinational and creative startups can use this time to improve their sales (as their sales must have plummeted too) and use it as an opportunity to create market value for the indigent by providing them an intermediary where they can sell their food to people who are willing to pay for it while sitting at their homes.
● Instead of traveling miles reaching a place for the only purpose of ‘charity’, citizens should try being vigilant around their localities and neighborhoods and find helping small businesses like these and buying things from them.
Acting as an intermediary
● Another way could be to connect them to a student mess or a student colony where there is usually a very high demand for "Ghar ka khana" at affordable rates. This will perfectly act as a utilitarian way of achieving customer seller relationships and needs.
● A lot of charity programs are already going on where people who have lost their jobs are given food and other beneficiaries. NGOs working on them can collaborate with them.
. . .
It is the most imperative time for the established as well as the newborn startups to try and connect with all these informal vendors under a common umbrella which can create an ample amount of supply chain assisting everybody multi laterally. The incumbent firms will be earning, the indigent is not going out of business, the consumer does not have to put an extra cost reaching the place and most importantly the economy can restart itself keeping in mind all the precautions that need to be taken. Humans as emotional beings tend to solve the problem on a first-hand basis without realizing its repercussions, we rather need to act as rational beings and do the most optimum activities to revive the whole disrupted economy sustainably. The old couple's incident is just another story.