The lovely tale of Liquor
during Lockdown and before
At every stage, addiction is driven by one of the most powerful, mysterious, and
vital forces of human existence. What drives addiction is longing —
a longing not just of brain, belly, or loins but finally of the heart.
Cornelius Platinga
​
The use of alcohol in India for drinking purposes dates back to somewhere between 3000 and 2000 BC. An alcoholic beverage called Sura which was distilled from the rice was popular at that time in India for common men to unwind at the end of a stressful day. . Yet the first mention of Alcohol appears in Rig Veda (1700BC). It mentions intoxicants like soma and prahamana. Although the soma plant might not exist today, it was famous for delivering a euphoric high. It was also recorded in the Samhita, the medical compendium of Sushruta that he who drinks soma will not age and will be impervious to fire, poison, or weapon attack. The sweet juice of Soma was also said to help establish a connection with the gods. Such was the popularity of alcohol. Initially used for medicinal purposes, with time it evolved and became the beverage that brought life to social gatherings, and eventually consuming alcohol has become a habit for many.
With such a rich history of not just humans but also of the gods,
what is a worldwide pandemic to stop anybody from drinking?
. . .
​
According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2018, an average Indian drinks approximately 5.7 liters of alcohol every year. In a population of casual and excessive drinkers, with the shutters of liquor stores down, it must have been extremely difficult for “certain” people to survive lockdown. In the first two phases of lockdown, the desperation had quadrupled prices of alcohol in the Grey Market of India. Also, According to Google Trends, online searches for “how to make alcohol at home” peaked in India during the fourth week of March, which was the same when the lockdown was announced. As a consequence, a few people died drinking home-brewed liquor. People committed suicide due to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Owing to the worsening situation and to reboot the economy, some states decided to open licensed liquor stores in the third phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic lockdown in India. This decision was the worst best decision the state governments could take. The kilometer-long queues in front of liquor stores were evidence that a pandemic can turn your life upside down yet your relationship with alcohol cannot move an inch.
The love in the hearts of those who are addicted was explicit. We might have seen addiction, we might have witnessed desperation but what happened in the month of May was madness, not just in terms of the way people pounced but also in the way the government earned. According to a report by Hindustan Times, on the first day of the third phase of Lockdown, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh recorded a sale of over Rs 100 Crore from liquor. On the second day of the reopening of Liquor stores, Karnataka reported sales of 197 crores in a single day which was the largest ever. Eventually, the prices of Liquor were hiked to 100% to discourage people from drinking.
. . .
​
There was a special corona fee that was imposed in Delhi by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. A 70% corona fee was imposed in Delhi, yet the sales did not drop. The entire situation was a disaster for the law enforcement officers, social distancing was easily abandoned and a basic code of conduct was happily violated. Despite the chaos created, the states continued to collect revenues. Home delivery of alcohol was allowed in Maharashtra and e-tokens were sold in Delhi.
​
Demand for liquor is inelastic which means that
the sale of alcohol is not much responsive to change in prices.
In general, since alcohol policy is a state subject in India, revenue from Liquor is a cash cow for state governments. In 2018 and 2019, four states collectively collected about 20,000 crores in taxes from the sale of liquor. As much as the state earns from the sale of Liquor it is undoubtedly, a threat to the Economy. Consumption of alcohol has dire health consequences. When a person consumes an alcoholic beverage, there is a rise in BAC because of which there is a gradual and progressive loss of driving ability because of an increase in reaction time, overconfidence, degraded muscle coordination, impaired concentration, and decreased auditory and visual acuity. This is known as drunken driving. (V. M. Anantha Eashwar, 2020) Drunken driving is the third biggest cause of road accidents and over speeding in India. Road accidents are not it; alcoholism causes sleep problems, heart, and liver issues. Also, it is not about an individual’s life, it ruins the lives of all people concerned.
Addiction also causes economic loss. In 2000, Vivek Benegal and his team assessed 113 patients admitted to a special de-addiction service for alcohol dependence. They found that
the average individual earned a mean of ₹1,661 but
spent ₹1,938 per month on alcohol, incurring high debt.
They also found that 95% did not work for about 14 days in a month. They concluded that it led to a loss of ₹13,823 per person per year in terms of foregone productivity. A more recent study, Health Impact and Economic Burden of Alcohol Consumption in India, led by Gaurav Jyani, concluded that alcohol-attributable deaths would lead to a loss of 258 million life-years between 2011 and 2050. The study placed the economic burden on the health system at $48.11 billion, and the societal burden (including health costs, productivity loss, and so on) at $1,867 billion. “This amounts to an average loss of 1.45% of the gross domestic product (GDP) per year to the Indian economy,” the study said. (Mint, 2020)
Setho ka Gaon

With each passing day, the ‘curtain of separation’ weighs down on the women of Afghanistan, paving the way for tyranny to thrive.
Arth

A Future with Feminist Economics
By Tanisha Gultai
After tutoring for six hours, running around markets to get groceries, looking after the family and household, my mother sighed, "We are not even seen as workers." It is the truth that women's work and labour have been veiled from the socio-economic gaze. The word 'economics' has a Greek origin. 'Eco' means home, and 'nomos' means accounts; thus, household management. Sadly, a lot of household work falls under the purview of women. The work is unpaid and does not fit into the account of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Gender roles define how work is distributed, and it is time to take note of that.
Feminist Economics aims at studying 'neglected' areas in the field of Economics. It includes unpaid care work, domestic violence, resource distribution, and gendered aspects of economic theories. With an aim to enhance the lives of women, children and men, feminist economics focuses on gender-aware economics and policy analysis. The unpaid care economy has been of prime importance to growth but is often invisibilized. Aspects of Feminist Economics are essential for economic recovery in the post-pandemic world where we aim to achieve UN's Sustainable Development Goals.
OECD defines unpaid care work as "... all unpaid services provided within a household for its members, including care of persons, housework and voluntary community work. These activities are considered work because theoretically, one could pay a third person to perform them." The 2019 NSS report highlighted that women spend 299 minutes on unpaid household work whereas men spend only 97 minutes. This inequality is threefold and has increased because of the pandemic. According to the Center for Global Development, women (15-64 years old) worked an additional 173 unpaid extra hours while men worked just 59 hours. In India, this inequality is more drastic; women took ten times more work. Women are at the forefront of every crisis, bearing the brunt with no armour or security. Resource distribution within the homes has always had women and girls on the shorter side of the stick. Food, education, rest, hygiene have always been scarce, affecting how women work within the formal and informal economy. The pandemic intensified the existing uneven resource distribution. Dalberg, a consulting firm, highlighted that women had to cut back on their food consumption from March to October last year. Women had run out of menstrual pads and could not access contraceptives due to disrupted public health campaigns. The pandemic led to a surge in unemployment rates, but women are unable to re-enter the workforce.
It is no hidden fact that women have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic regarding work, income, safety and human rights. While vaccination drives are seen as a beam of hope, various factors have led to a vaccine gender gap. Vaccine hesitancy, digital divide, immobility are some key factors, among others. According to Cowin, for every 1000 vaccinated men, only 856 were given to women. Moving forward to a more robust, resilient, but unequal economy is an unjust notion for people and the economy.
The Way Forward
The pandemic has hammered the economy, and more crises might be the final nail in the coffin. The way forward really needs to account for the neglected spots in contemporary economics. Measures such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have repeatedly failed to account for a large section of the work undertaken by women. The first step would be to acknowledge that there is a problem that needs to be addressed. The said problem needs concrete and systemic steps for the valuation of the invisible care economy. Marilyn Waring, a principal founder of feminist economics, highlighted that "GDP counts oil spills and wars as contributors to economic growth, while child-rearing and housekeeping are deemed valueless." In a post covid world, gender-aware policies and economic outlook can solve fundamental inequalities. Such policies would mean that the veiled unpaid care economy has adequate infrastructure to sustain. New measures such as time indicators can help locate needs within the economy and alleviate time poverty. Furthermore, investment in this field of study can formulate and implement better policies that uplift marginalised communities.
The various challenges imposed by the covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of social security. The lack of a security net made the covid waves harder to stand, especially for the marginalised groups. An economy with principles of feminist economics can solve the underlying economic, social and political issues.

Tanisha Gulati
Daulat Ram College, Delhi University
* The comments section is open for a healthy debate and relevant arguments. Use of inappropriate language and unnecessary hits towards
the department, the newsletter, or the author will not be entertained.