The lovely tale of Liquor
during Lockdown and before
At every stage, addiction is driven by one of the most powerful, mysterious, and
vital forces of human existence. What drives addiction is longing —
a longing not just of brain, belly, or loins but finally of the heart.
Cornelius Platinga
​
The use of alcohol in India for drinking purposes dates back to somewhere between 3000 and 2000 BC. An alcoholic beverage called Sura which was distilled from the rice was popular at that time in India for common men to unwind at the end of a stressful day. . Yet the first mention of Alcohol appears in Rig Veda (1700BC). It mentions intoxicants like soma and prahamana. Although the soma plant might not exist today, it was famous for delivering a euphoric high. It was also recorded in the Samhita, the medical compendium of Sushruta that he who drinks soma will not age and will be impervious to fire, poison, or weapon attack. The sweet juice of Soma was also said to help establish a connection with the gods. Such was the popularity of alcohol. Initially used for medicinal purposes, with time it evolved and became the beverage that brought life to social gatherings, and eventually consuming alcohol has become a habit for many.
With such a rich history of not just humans but also of the gods,
what is a worldwide pandemic to stop anybody from drinking?
. . .
​
According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2018, an average Indian drinks approximately 5.7 liters of alcohol every year. In a population of casual and excessive drinkers, with the shutters of liquor stores down, it must have been extremely difficult for “certain” people to survive lockdown. In the first two phases of lockdown, the desperation had quadrupled prices of alcohol in the Grey Market of India. Also, According to Google Trends, online searches for “how to make alcohol at home” peaked in India during the fourth week of March, which was the same when the lockdown was announced. As a consequence, a few people died drinking home-brewed liquor. People committed suicide due to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Owing to the worsening situation and to reboot the economy, some states decided to open licensed liquor stores in the third phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic lockdown in India. This decision was the worst best decision the state governments could take. The kilometer-long queues in front of liquor stores were evidence that a pandemic can turn your life upside down yet your relationship with alcohol cannot move an inch.
The love in the hearts of those who are addicted was explicit. We might have seen addiction, we might have witnessed desperation but what happened in the month of May was madness, not just in terms of the way people pounced but also in the way the government earned. According to a report by Hindustan Times, on the first day of the third phase of Lockdown, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh recorded a sale of over Rs 100 Crore from liquor. On the second day of the reopening of Liquor stores, Karnataka reported sales of 197 crores in a single day which was the largest ever. Eventually, the prices of Liquor were hiked to 100% to discourage people from drinking.
. . .
​
There was a special corona fee that was imposed in Delhi by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. A 70% corona fee was imposed in Delhi, yet the sales did not drop. The entire situation was a disaster for the law enforcement officers, social distancing was easily abandoned and a basic code of conduct was happily violated. Despite the chaos created, the states continued to collect revenues. Home delivery of alcohol was allowed in Maharashtra and e-tokens were sold in Delhi.
​
Demand for liquor is inelastic which means that
the sale of alcohol is not much responsive to change in prices.
In general, since alcohol policy is a state subject in India, revenue from Liquor is a cash cow for state governments. In 2018 and 2019, four states collectively collected about 20,000 crores in taxes from the sale of liquor. As much as the state earns from the sale of Liquor it is undoubtedly, a threat to the Economy. Consumption of alcohol has dire health consequences. When a person consumes an alcoholic beverage, there is a rise in BAC because of which there is a gradual and progressive loss of driving ability because of an increase in reaction time, overconfidence, degraded muscle coordination, impaired concentration, and decreased auditory and visual acuity. This is known as drunken driving. (V. M. Anantha Eashwar, 2020) Drunken driving is the third biggest cause of road accidents and over speeding in India. Road accidents are not it; alcoholism causes sleep problems, heart, and liver issues. Also, it is not about an individual’s life, it ruins the lives of all people concerned.
Addiction also causes economic loss. In 2000, Vivek Benegal and his team assessed 113 patients admitted to a special de-addiction service for alcohol dependence. They found that
the average individual earned a mean of ₹1,661 but
spent ₹1,938 per month on alcohol, incurring high debt.
They also found that 95% did not work for about 14 days in a month. They concluded that it led to a loss of ₹13,823 per person per year in terms of foregone productivity. A more recent study, Health Impact and Economic Burden of Alcohol Consumption in India, led by Gaurav Jyani, concluded that alcohol-attributable deaths would lead to a loss of 258 million life-years between 2011 and 2050. The study placed the economic burden on the health system at $48.11 billion, and the societal burden (including health costs, productivity loss, and so on) at $1,867 billion. “This amounts to an average loss of 1.45% of the gross domestic product (GDP) per year to the Indian economy,” the study said. (Mint, 2020)
Setho ka Gaon

With each passing day, the ‘curtain of separation’ weighs down on the women of Afghanistan, paving the way for tyranny to thrive.
Arth

The likelihood of finding a job after being unemployed varies for different age groups
By Khushi Chugh

Khushi Chugh
Hindu College, Delhi University
* The comments section is open for a healthy debate and relevant arguments. Use of inappropriate language and unnecessary hits towards
the department, the newsletter, or the author will not be entertained.
The article mainly focuses on the characteristics, scope, and solutions of youth and old age unemployment.
Youth unemployment begins primarily when young people attain the legal working age, which is 14 years in India (adolescents between the age group of 14-18 years cannot be employed in any hazardous occupation- Article 24). Although (according to the International Labour Office) many people face difficulties in finding their first job, young workers are more likely to find a job after being unemployed than old aged people. Older workers are often eliminated from labour markets while their younger colleagues can still expect some job prospects.
One of the dominating factors causing youth unemployment is the economic growth rate. There is a direct relationship between the level of economic activity and youth employment. During boom periods, the level of youth employment is high. On the other hand, when the aggregate level of economic activity is low, there is a decline in the demand for labour in general. During these periods, young workers are usually affected more strongly than their older counterparts. The second reason for youth unemployment is the lack of expertise, knowledge, and insufficient skills.
Unemployed older workers face many challenges while finding new employment opportunities. Adults have a more difficult time reintegrating into the labour market after losing their jobs than young unemployed people. According to studies, as people get older and their unemployment stretches, their chances of finding work decreases.
Across the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, the hiring rate for workers aged 50 or up is less than half of workers aged 25-49. When compared to an older worker, a younger worker is 40% more likely to be called back for an interview.
The major reasons for the reluctance of employers to hire older workers are that they are viewed to be less adaptable and less productive compared to the youth. In addition, higher salaries might be expected by older people (specifically by those in the age groups of 45-59 ) owing to wider experience and knowledge in their fields. Firms may also encounter challenges in adjusting working conditions to meet the requirements of employment protection laws. Perhaps, the low hiring rate of older workers arises mainly due to their age rather than labour market conditions.
The opposite goes for those in the age group of 30-44, where the rate of re-employment is mainly affected by labour markets or business cycles.
Since both youth and old age unemployment differ in scope and reasons, developing different strategies to address both issues is necessary.
The problem of youth unemployment can be solved by creating more jobs. When aggregate economic activity is high, both adult employment and youth employment rates soar as well.
On the other hand, old age unemployment necessitates a different approach because their prospects of obtaining work are dependent on their age rather than the overall business environment. It could be tackled with the help of earned income tax credits, differential minimum wage plans. As per this policy, the government should cut the minimum pay for older people. In addition, to prevent the income disparities between the older and younger workers, the former should get an earned income tax credit, thus bringing their minimum salary and earned income tax credits to the same level as the minimum pay of younger workers.