The lovely tale of Liquor
during Lockdown and before
At every stage, addiction is driven by one of the most powerful, mysterious, and
vital forces of human existence. What drives addiction is longing —
a longing not just of brain, belly, or loins but finally of the heart.
Cornelius Platinga
​
The use of alcohol in India for drinking purposes dates back to somewhere between 3000 and 2000 BC. An alcoholic beverage called Sura which was distilled from the rice was popular at that time in India for common men to unwind at the end of a stressful day. . Yet the first mention of Alcohol appears in Rig Veda (1700BC). It mentions intoxicants like soma and prahamana. Although the soma plant might not exist today, it was famous for delivering a euphoric high. It was also recorded in the Samhita, the medical compendium of Sushruta that he who drinks soma will not age and will be impervious to fire, poison, or weapon attack. The sweet juice of Soma was also said to help establish a connection with the gods. Such was the popularity of alcohol. Initially used for medicinal purposes, with time it evolved and became the beverage that brought life to social gatherings, and eventually consuming alcohol has become a habit for many.
With such a rich history of not just humans but also of the gods,
what is a worldwide pandemic to stop anybody from drinking?
. . .
​
According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2018, an average Indian drinks approximately 5.7 liters of alcohol every year. In a population of casual and excessive drinkers, with the shutters of liquor stores down, it must have been extremely difficult for “certain” people to survive lockdown. In the first two phases of lockdown, the desperation had quadrupled prices of alcohol in the Grey Market of India. Also, According to Google Trends, online searches for “how to make alcohol at home” peaked in India during the fourth week of March, which was the same when the lockdown was announced. As a consequence, a few people died drinking home-brewed liquor. People committed suicide due to alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Owing to the worsening situation and to reboot the economy, some states decided to open licensed liquor stores in the third phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic lockdown in India. This decision was the worst best decision the state governments could take. The kilometer-long queues in front of liquor stores were evidence that a pandemic can turn your life upside down yet your relationship with alcohol cannot move an inch.
The love in the hearts of those who are addicted was explicit. We might have seen addiction, we might have witnessed desperation but what happened in the month of May was madness, not just in terms of the way people pounced but also in the way the government earned. According to a report by Hindustan Times, on the first day of the third phase of Lockdown, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh recorded a sale of over Rs 100 Crore from liquor. On the second day of the reopening of Liquor stores, Karnataka reported sales of 197 crores in a single day which was the largest ever. Eventually, the prices of Liquor were hiked to 100% to discourage people from drinking.
. . .
​
There was a special corona fee that was imposed in Delhi by Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. A 70% corona fee was imposed in Delhi, yet the sales did not drop. The entire situation was a disaster for the law enforcement officers, social distancing was easily abandoned and a basic code of conduct was happily violated. Despite the chaos created, the states continued to collect revenues. Home delivery of alcohol was allowed in Maharashtra and e-tokens were sold in Delhi.
​
Demand for liquor is inelastic which means that
the sale of alcohol is not much responsive to change in prices.
In general, since alcohol policy is a state subject in India, revenue from Liquor is a cash cow for state governments. In 2018 and 2019, four states collectively collected about 20,000 crores in taxes from the sale of liquor. As much as the state earns from the sale of Liquor it is undoubtedly, a threat to the Economy. Consumption of alcohol has dire health consequences. When a person consumes an alcoholic beverage, there is a rise in BAC because of which there is a gradual and progressive loss of driving ability because of an increase in reaction time, overconfidence, degraded muscle coordination, impaired concentration, and decreased auditory and visual acuity. This is known as drunken driving. (V. M. Anantha Eashwar, 2020) Drunken driving is the third biggest cause of road accidents and over speeding in India. Road accidents are not it; alcoholism causes sleep problems, heart, and liver issues. Also, it is not about an individual’s life, it ruins the lives of all people concerned.
Addiction also causes economic loss. In 2000, Vivek Benegal and his team assessed 113 patients admitted to a special de-addiction service for alcohol dependence. They found that
the average individual earned a mean of ₹1,661 but
spent ₹1,938 per month on alcohol, incurring high debt.
They also found that 95% did not work for about 14 days in a month. They concluded that it led to a loss of ₹13,823 per person per year in terms of foregone productivity. A more recent study, Health Impact and Economic Burden of Alcohol Consumption in India, led by Gaurav Jyani, concluded that alcohol-attributable deaths would lead to a loss of 258 million life-years between 2011 and 2050. The study placed the economic burden on the health system at $48.11 billion, and the societal burden (including health costs, productivity loss, and so on) at $1,867 billion. “This amounts to an average loss of 1.45% of the gross domestic product (GDP) per year to the Indian economy,” the study said. (Mint, 2020)
Setho ka Gaon

With each passing day, the ‘curtain of separation’ weighs down on the women of Afghanistan, paving the way for tyranny to thrive.
Arth

US-RUSSIA CONFLICT: A Story of Economic Sanctions
By Ananya Dubey

A recent phone call between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US president Joe Biden ended with Moscow calling USA’s sanctions a ‘colossal mistake’.
The Russian invasion of Crimea and the occupation of eastern parts of Ukraine hit the headlines for the first time in 2014. The US claimed that it was a breach of international protocols and treaties and a disrespect of Ukraine’s sovereignty. In the light of these developments, the USA called for economic sanctions on Russia.
Sanctions have been used by several nations extensively as a major Foreign Policy Tool. Sanctions lie somewhere between diplomacy and war. They can be of several forms: trade restrictions, travel embargo, ban on certain entities and companies of the targeted state, the shutdown of websites from that state, ban on arms and so on. They are used to alter undesirable political and economic decisions taken by the targeted state. Sanctions can be unilateral, for instance, China’s ban on Australian Wheat and Barley or they can be multilateral, such as, the P5’s ban on Iran’s Nuclear Programme.
​
What is the Conflict About?
Russia’s interest in Ukraine can be analyzed from two lenses: the historical and the geopolitical perspective. Though the ground reality has several more complexities, we can essentially understand Moscow’s stand through these two viewpoints.
Russia shares a historical bond with Kiev, which existed from way before the Cold War Era. Ukraine and Russia formed the Ancient Russian State of Rus. The people of Russia have a shared heritage and culture with the people of Ukraine. At least one-third of the present Ukrainian population speaks Russian and feels closer to Russian culture. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia felt a bitter loss when Ukraine emerged as a separate entity. This explains the sentimental aspect of Russia- Ukraine ties.
If we talk of the geopolitical reality, Russian President Putin feels the reemergence of Cold War Rivalries as NATO is expanding its ambit in the east. Ukraine has held several military drills with the USA and Russia seems skeptical of these growing developments. Ukraine’s political heads wish to be aligned with the vocally democratic USA and this irks the Russian leadership. It is only natural for Russia to feel threatened as it shares a 1200-mile-long border with Ukraine and could be targeted in case of a military standoff with the USA. This reason is cited by the Russian officials for the deployment of military personnel near the Russia-Ukraine border.
Why did the US Impose Sanctions on Russia?
Russia tried several soft power and hard power tactics on Ukraine. It spread disinformation amongst the masses and launched a cyber-attack amongst several other instruments to pressurize the Ukrainian leadership into submission but to no avail. President Vladimir Putin realizes his losing influence in Ukraine. The White House officials think that the building of troops near the Ukraine border is an ominous sign of an impending invasion though Moscow denies these allegations.
How Do These Sanctions Impact Russia?
Under the current sanctions, Washington has blacklisted several Russian companies, barred US commercial banks from buying Russian bonds and made it difficult for “Dollar-Ruble” transactions to take place. These sanctions led to the value of the Russian Currency falling steadily.
Russia has also witnessed a fall in the prices in the oil market as well as reduced trade after the imposition of these sanctions and the Russian economy has been reeling under these developments since 2014. The recent threats by the US add fuel to fire.
Though Economic Sanctions have been used extensively by the US, there have been mixed opinions about the efficiency of the same. Several studies suggest that economic sanctions are not really effective and cause significant harm to the international economy, especially if imposed unilaterally. For instance, the reduction in dollar- ruble exchange has been detrimental not just to Moscow but to Washington as well. The US has lost on several financially benefiting trade exchanges due to political rivalry.
Sanctions ultimately fail to meet their objective as it doesn’t discipline the targeted state but just diverts their trade elsewhere, as was seen in Cuba. It needs to be understood that in an interconnected world as we have today, it is difficult to coerce a country through unilateral sanctions.
Conclusion
I believe that Russia needs to be clearer about its motives behind the deployments in Ukraine, needs to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and needs to understand the shifting world power dynamics and alignments since the Cold-War Era has long ended. On the other hand, the US needs to assure Russia that it will not use Ukraine’s territory to launch an attack against Russia. The US also needs to reduce the usage of sanctions as the regular imposition of the same would dilute its effectiveness without achieving substantial benefits. The US and Russia need to reach a common ground to ensure better diplomatic ties between the two economic powers.

Ananya Dubey
Editor, Editorial Board
* The comments section is open for a healthy debate and relevant arguments. Use of inappropriate language and unnecessary hits towards
the department, the newsletter, or the author will not be entertained.